Browse Articles
Published Articles
Articles in Press
Journal Menu
About this Journal
Article Processing Charges
Author Guidelines
Bibliographic Information
Contact Information
Editorial Board
Reviewer Guidelines
Reviewers Acknowledgment
SRX Physics
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 640826
doi:10.3814/2010/640826
Research Article

Relativistic Quasilinear Description of Three-Dimensional Diffusion

Southwestern Institute of Physics, P.O. Box 432, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received 2009-08-28
  • Revised 2009-11-02
  • Accepted 2009-11-05

Copyright © 2010 Z. T. Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Quasilinear theory is developed by using canonical variables for a relativistic plasma. It is self-consistent, including momentum, pitch angle, and spatial diffusions. By assuming the wave field as a superposition of known toroidal and poloidal Fourier modes, the quasilinear diffusion coefficients are written in a form which can be directly evaluated using the output of a spectral full-wave solver of Maxwell equations in toroidal plasmas. The formalism is special for tokamas and, therefore, simple and suitable for simulations of cyclotron heating, current drive, and radio-frequency wave-induced radial transport in ITER.

1. Introduction

Interaction of radio-frequency (RF) wave with plasma in magnetic confinement devices has been a very important discipline of plasma physics. To approach more realistic description of wave-plasma interaction in a time scale longer than the kinetic time scales bounce-average is needed. The long-time evolution of the kinetic distribution can be treated with Fokker-Planck equation. The behavior of the plasma and the most interesting macroscopic effects are obtained by balancing the diffusion term with a collision term.

For the relativistic particles the action and angle variables initiated by Kaufman [1] are introduced. The technique of the area-conserved transformation proposed by Lichtenberg and Lieberman [2] is employed. A new invariant which actually is an implicit Hamiltonian is formed by using bounce average and from which the bounce frequency and precession frequency can be calculated. Using new action and angle variables the relativistic quasi-linear equation is derived, including spatial diffusion. It is different from Brizard and Chan [3] where magnetic field does not have the toroidal component. An elegant form of the quasi-linear kinetic equation including a term describing RF wave-induced radial diffusion has been derived by Eriksson and Helander [4]. This paper is an extension of their work with relativistic effects. In most of the above derivations for the quasi-linear operator it is assumed that the wave field in the vicinity of the resonances can be represented in an Eikonal form. Here, the field is supposed as a superposition of given toroidal and poloidal Fourier modes, instead. This is the representation used to solve the Maxwell equation in tokamak plasmas with a spectral full-wave code, for example, TORIC [5]. For the circulating particles, under the conditions of small Larmor radius and first harmonic resonance, the diffusion coefficient is compatible with the numerical code developed by Cardinali et al. [6].

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In next section the exact guiding center variables are derived with Hamiltonian transformation. The center variables are derived with Hamiltonian transformation. The bounce-averaged quasi-linear equation is carried out in Section 3. A brief summary is presented in the last section.

2. Exact Guiding Center Variables

In tokamak configuration, the relativistic Hamiltonian of a charged particle can be expressed as

(1) where denotes and are the vector potential components of the magnetic field, and is the electrical potential and assumed to be a function of Here, is the poloidal flux of the magnetic field. and e are the rest mass and charge. , and are the canonical momenta conjugate to the cylindrical coordinates and , respectively.

The magnetic field can be expressed as (2) where I is related to the poloidal current. Then, in tokamaks, we have

(3)

We introduce a generating function [7] for changing to the guiding center variables:

(4) where

(5) and is the gyrofrequency in the toroidal field, is the Larmor radius, is the gyrophase, and subscripts 0 and c refer to the values at the magnetic axis and the guiding center position, respectively. X and are the new coordinates conjugate to the momenta (6) The other two canonical variables and do not change in the new coordinates. The old coordinates are connected with the new ones through four equations:

(7) (8) (9) (10) where is actually the Z coordinate of the guiding center, . Such fact that a momentum is turned to be a coordinate often occurs during area-conserved canonical transformation [2].

The Jacobian in the area-conserved transformation is unity [2], that is, (11) Substituting (7) and (8) into (1), the exact Hamiltonian for the relativistic particles is

(12) where denotes . It is suitable for particle simulation. The equations of motion and Vlasov’s equation can be derived from the Hamiltonian.

3. QuasiLinear Equation

If the Larmor radius is smaller than the scale length of the system, a small parameter may be introduced where is the scale length.

For the gyrokinetics the Hamiltonian in (12) could be averaged and reduced as

(13) to the first order of , where is the toroidal velocity.

We form a new invariant [2]:

(14) The action invariant is the toroidal flux enclosed by a particle orbit which actually is an implicit Hamiltonian from which the bounce frequency and precession frequency can be calculated.

For trapped particles in a large aspect ratio configuration, that is, , we get

(15) The bounce frequency and the precession frequency are obtained from (15) as in [8, 9]:

(16) where is the gyrofrequency in poloidal magnetic field, and is the magnetic shear. and are complete elliptic function of the first and second kinds.

For the circulating particles,

(17) where represents direction of the circulating particle and . The bounce-averaged gyrofrequency of the trapped particles is

(18) while for the circulating particles,

(19) where is a nonlocal gyro-frequency (also seen in [4]).

Lamalle [10] seems to prove that the frequencies for the local and nonlocal scenarios in the resonances are compatible. If the momentum, , is constants of motion, the frequency is which is bounce-averaged frequency [4]. The coordinates are where could represent or [2]. The new momenta and are conjugate to the coordinates and in which is actually a position variable [8].

In the extended phase space the Hamiltonian is written as follows [2]:

(20) where is the particle energy.

According to Liouville’s theorem, the distribution function, f, satisfies Vlasov’s equation:

(21) where f can be divided in two parts, the averaged part and oscillatory part:

(22) The energy perturbation from (1) is

(23) where considering (9) and (10), and are

(24)

The linear solution of (21) is

(25) where denotes , and in (22) is a function of , and only, independent of and and satisfies the equation:

(26) from (21), where we have used Hamiltonian equations, and are canonical variables, and is the conjugate to . If is a slow function of and we get the quasi-linear equation:

(27) where is differential operator of actions. Here, represents spatial diffusion while and represent velocity space diffusion, C is a collision operator normalized to which can take the form given by [11], is collision frequency, and D is diffusion coefficient:

(28) which is similar to the one obtained in [4]. We have used the well-known Plemelj formula called as Landau’s rule in [4]:

(29)

For one harmonic from (24) and (29) we get

(30) where is the vector potential of incident electromagnetic wave, is the guiding center position, and is the angle between and directions in the cylindrical coordinates. Equations (27), (28), and (30) are the main results in this paper.

For the relativistic circulating particles the resonant term in (28) is written as

(31) where is the relativistic factor, and which is consistent with the code developed in [6] if k approaches zero. However, there are differences for trapped or barely circulating particles.

From (28) and (31) we get

(32) where and are normalized with respect to the thermal momentum . The steady state is described by a relativistic Maxwellian with temperature . From the definition of the -function, when ,

(33) (34) where the chosen variables are related to the momentum and , with being the pitch angle.

4. Summary

The action and angle variables initiated by Kaufman are used [1]. The area-conserved transformation is employed [2]. The bounce-averaged quasi-linear Fokker-Planck equation for the relativistic particles is rigorously derived, including momentum, pitch angle, and spatial diffusion, that is, the three-dimensional diffusion. Equations (27), (28), and (30) are the main results of the work. The diffusion coefficient expressed in (28) is similar to the one obtained by Eriksson and Helander [4]. Equation (34) is only for circulating particles. Most of the past derivations of the quasi-linear operator assume that the wave field in the vicinity of the resonances can be represented in a Eikonal form. Here, the field is supposed, instead, to be given as a superposition of toroidal and poloidal Fourier modes. This is the representation used to solve Maxwell equation in tokamak plasmas with spectral full-wave code, for example, TORIC [5]. The formalism is special for tokamas; so it is simple and suitable for simulation of cyclotron heating, current drive, and radio-frequency wave-induced radial transport in ITER.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to give special thanks to Dr. A. Cardinali for his report and his code left here during his visit to SWIP. Z. T. Wang would like to thank Dr. R. D. Hazeltine and Dr. P. Morrision for checking the canonical transformation procedure and many helpful discussions when he worked at the Institute for Fusion Studies University of Texas at Austin. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China under Grant nos. 10475043, 10535020, 10375019, and 10135020.

References

  1. A. N. Kaufman, “Quasilinear diffusion of an axisymmetric toroidal plasma,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1063–1069, 1972.
  2. J. Lichtenberg and M. A. Lieberman, Regular and Stochastic Motion: Applied Sciences, vol. 38, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1983.
  3. A. J. Brizard and A. A. Chan, “Relativistic quasilinear diffusion in axisymmetric magnetic geometry for arbitrary-frequency electromagnetic fluctuations,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 4220–4229, 2004.
  4. L.-G. Eriksson and P. Helander, “Monte Carlo operators for orbit-averaged Fokker-Planck equations,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 308–314, 1994.
  5. M. Brambila, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 41, p. 1, 1999.
  6. A. Cardinali, L. Morini, and F. Zonca, in Proceedings of the Joint Varenna-Lausanne International Workshop on Theory of Fusion Plasmas, J. Conner, O. Sauter, and E. Sindoni, Eds., vol. 871, p. 292, American Institute of Physics, Varenna, Italy, 2006.
  7. Z. Wang, “Plasma transport at magnetic axis in toroidal confinement systems,” Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 41, pp. A679–A686, 1999.
  8. R. D. Hazeltine, S. M. Mahajan, and D. A. Hitchcock, “Quasi-linear diffusion and radial transport in tokamaks,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1164–1179, 1981.
  9. Z. T. Wang, Y. X. Long, J. Q. Dong, L. Wang, and F. Zonca, “Fishbone instability excited by barely trapped electrons,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 158–160, 2006.
  10. P. U. Lamalle, “A qualitative comparison of theoretical models of radiofrequency wave propagation and absorption in tokamak plasmas,” Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 465–479, 1998.
  11. B. J. Braams and C. F. F. Karney, “Conductivity of a relativistic plasma,” Physics of Fluids B, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 1355–1368, 1989.